"Where my passion lies is genital surgery."
He's figuring out how to surgically remove genitals and recreate opposite sex organs as he goes along. Is that why doctors call their work a "practice"?
I came across a shocking video on Twitter of a disturbing surgeon who does GAS - gender affirming surgeries.
Kudos to Ashley St. Clair for bringing it to our attention.
Since we cannot embed Twitter videos anymore, you’ll have to click on this screenshot below to watch.
The not-so-good doctor’s name is Blair Peters. He’s a surgeon based in Oregon who goes by “The Queer Surgeon” on social media.
He’s also an assistant professor at OHSU (Oregon Health & Science University).
His Instagram is @queersurgeon. It looks like he deleted his Twitter profile.
Of course, he’s more than a surgeon—he’s an “activist”, according to his IG bio.
An activist with a scalpel—what could go wrong?
A lot, actually.
Here is what Peters said during the two-minute video clip—talk about revealing!
Just like the clot shots—this new “practice” is highly experimental!
“80% or so of my practice is gender affirming surgery. I do facial, chest surgery and genital surgery. But the majority of my practice—and where my passion lies—is really genital surgery cases. I do a lot of vaginalplasty and a lot of phalloplasty.
I would just say they are expanding in every direction. *Awkwardly laughs*
So, a lot of adolescents presenting for surgical intervention—but also a lot of people who are in their 70s are sometimes coming in for genital surgery. And then everything in between.
But the adolescents for sure present some unique challenges. Obviously, there is a great evidence supporting pubertal suppression for a whole variety of benefits. But the one thing that is very new is genital surgery on someone who has underwent pubertal suppression.
Not so much an issue with someone assigned with female at birth anatomy that undergoes a phalloplasty because we’re creating something with a free tissue transfer flap, anyway. But a much bigger issue for an individual that is undergoing a penile inversion vaginalplasty because we use all of that tissue to create the vulva as well as line the internal vaginal canal. And as a specialty, those of us who do a fairly high volume of genital gender affirming surgery—you know, we’ve maybe done a couple, a handful of pubertally suppressed adolescents as a field, and no one has published on it yet. OHSU, we’re just putting our first series together because we’re just kind of learning and figuring out what works.
But it’s really changing things because you don’t have enough tissue to line the vaginal canal, so you either have to take a skin graph or take skin from elsewhere or use an artificial product.
The way that we’re dealing with it is by using a robot and we’re basically performing inter-abdominal components of the surgeries. We’re using peratinum which is the inner lining of the abdomen to line most of the vaginal canal—and by doing that, that allows us to use all of the remaining tissue externally to create a vulva and try to make also an aesthetic result.”
Butcher Blair has seven reviews on Google that average out to 2.7 STARS.
Here is one that left commentary with their low score:
Surgeon Admits Performing Transsexual Surgeries on Young Children
From Breitbart:
A pro-transgender university surgeon says he is performing irreversible sex surgeries on pre-pubescent children who have had no experiences of sexual feelings and little ability to consent or accomplish the required post-surgical procedures.
“It’s a very complicated issue,” Dr. Blair Peters, a Canadian-trained “queer” surgeon at Oregon Health & Science University, told a friendly interviewer. “But I think definitely something that we’re going to learn a lot more about in the next five to 10 years as we’re doing just increasing numbers of these cases,” Blair said in the now-archived video.
Getting consent and cooperation from the pre-sexual children is also a problem, Blair acknowledged:
It’s challenging because there’s this question of ‘How does that factor into consent?’ when you’re consenting someone for pubertal suppression, and there likely is some effect on downstage genital surgery, but you don’t know if an individual is going to desire genital surgery in the future or not.
And then it’s also hard to have a conversation with someone that maybe hasn’t went through puberty or ever engaged in sexual activity. It’s a really tricky thing … more often than not, there’s been almost no genital engagement in terms of self-stimulation or masturbation. So then trying to assess things like erogenous outcomes after a surgery when someone’s never had an erogenous experience is incredibly difficult because they don’t really have a baseline to compare it to.
The issue is especially difficult for young boys because they are expected to repeatedly use a painful wand to prevent their male body from closing up their just-created “vaginal” canal, Peters noted:
And then, you know, post-operative care, anyone knows that seeing the post-op or vaginal classification is really intense and we’re kind of asking someone that is younger and hasn’t really engaged or done much with their genitalia, to all of a sudden do this like really aggressive relaxation for dilation, and it’s just a huge ask. So we’re finding that to be a barrier, almost more so than [surgery].
Many of these medical problems are mentioned in accounts by young people who go through the surgeries, such as “Jazz” Jennings.
The surgeons know little about the long-term outcomes of the experimental surgery on children, according to Blair, who describes himself as a “queer” surgeon:
You know, we’ve maybe done a couple, a handful, of pubertily suppressed adolescents as a field and no one’s published on it yet. OHSU is, we’re just putting our first series [of studies] together as we’re kind of learning and figuring out what works.
The frank admissions are a problem for the transgender industry and the insurance firms that cover lawsuits but also for President Joe Biden and the many Democrats in D.C. who are trying to shift progressives’ attention from policy failures on poverty, economics, and war, toward the emotional concept of needy “trans kids.”
“The reason they’re playing up the trans issue is to basically signal to their base, that [Biden] is the boldest candidate they’re gonna get, and they don’t want to lose voters to the Green Party,” said Terry Schilling, the president of American Principles Project:
The 2020 election was actually very close the terms of the Electoral College — it’s like 43,000 votes and you shift votes he loses. A Green Party candidate on the ballot in Wisconsin, Arizona, Georgia, in North Carolina, and will basically guarantee he loses if he doesn’t solidify the base.
The GOP has a chance to win more suburban moms by showcasing testimonies about the horrifying damage done to kids, Schilling told Breitbart News:
Suburban women, they’re with us on banning surgeries for minors, but they don’t believe it’s happening. They’re like, “Oh, yeah, but this isn’t really happening that much.” So the next Republican nominee, he’s got to talk a lot about this and bring out the transitioners. Like you almost want a “Detransitioners for Trump” coalition in order to get this out there.
Peters’ admissions drew much criticism online.
“This interview is mind-boggling,” said a tweet by 4thWaveNow, a group that opposes the transsexual ideology’s demand that Americans must submit to the cross-sex claims by men. The statement continued:
Gender surgeon Blair Peters admits how much he doesn’t know about outcomes (e.g. sexual function) for puberty-blocked males he operates on; we’ll “know more” in 5 to 10 years after more teens undergo genital surgeries.
“For an entire year, the mainstream media said that “gender-affirming” doctors were not performing genital surgeries on children,” tweeted Christopher Rufo. “This was always a lie—and now they’re admitting it in the open … There’s no other way to say it: they’re castrating kids in the name of ‘gender-affirming care.'”
“In any sane society this video would be used as evidence in Blair Peters’s trial for crimes against humanity,” tweeted lawyer Dan Minucci.
Polls show the public is increasingly opposed to the transexual agenda, especially the medical sector’s intensive marketing of transgenderism to kids:
A tsunami of angry parents—moms and dads both—is building…
There is a growing pushback by professionals and media against the progressive-backed profitable business of sex surgery on children and teenagers.
There is also a legal hurricane building strength on the horizon:
Numerous GOP politicians — especially Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis — have responded by championing the public’s opposition to transgenderism. “There is value in making sure our society is rooted in truth, not in a social fad,” DeSantis said.
Elephant in the Room
Leave a news tip: breakthenarrative@protonmail.com
Single donations to News Detectives: https://buymeacoffee.com/MatthieuLumiere
I bet when Hannibal Lector talks about eating people's brains, he thinks he sounds perfectly normal too.
My motto has been do not comply.