The Church of Scientology is an interesting censor. I don't know if Sanger is a psyop within a psyop. Just a nanosecond ago, the CIA and FBI were the opposite of far left and liberal. Without question, Wikipedia is a propaganda tool. But I wonder if it's now pushing people in another direction. The concept of Wikipedia is brilliant, and they definitely got the whole world to do the work for them. It still gives good information on non-controversial topics and even between the lines on the censored ones. Thanks for this article, Matthieu!
I agree that some of the historical entries to Wikipedia are helpful. But of course, the deep state is going use that website to their advantage. It probably gets more traffic than most television networks.
I'm not surprised that the Scientology hierarchy would manipulate Wikipedia pages to censor and cover up their wicked deeds. They are ruthless in their PR.
During the Obama years a law was passed that dismantled the block on U.S. intelligence agencies, allowing them to legally do psyops and propagandize the American public. The timeline that Sanger lays out does make sense to me based on other things that were happening from '06 to 2018.
"During the Obama years a law was passed that dismantled the block on U.S. intelligence agencies, allowing them to legally do psyops and propagandize the American public."
For those unclear, that would be "the Smith-Mundt Modernization Act of 2012"
The original " unimproved" act had declared such activities illegal.
Yes! I appreciate you filling in that detail, BT. I didn't have time last Tuesday to look that up. 2012 does appear to synch with the timeline when the propaganda inside U.S. borders exploded.
While I don't know the specific contents of the revised act, my understanding is that it was a 180 degree reversal: protective act becomes predatory/permissive act.
Citizens aware of the change might feel compelled to re-examine:
1) Sandy Hook( Dec2012 event, possibly quite close to bill passage, unsure)
Yes, Scientology's inclusion confirms the role Mathew Crawford has been saying they have, as a central source of chaos agents and controlled narrative.
I'm just wondering if this follows the Malone playbook. Wait until something's obvious to everyone who's paying attention, then get an 'insider' to blow the whistle and point to the solution--Conservapedia! Keeping everything inside the game lines of left vs. right.
I used to love Wikipedia and donated to them, even did a little editing/ contributions. Now it's clear that Jimmy Wales, WEFfie YGL, right?, had this planned from the start. What are the odds his co-founder wasn't in on it?
Unless I am looking for something trivial and fun, I scroll right past the wikipedia answer.
Someone in response to me saying that said "Well, why don't you go in and correct the mistakes made by others."
My reply was "that's exactly my point,"
The idea of open source information is great...until you realize that agendas are out there.
And who am I to declare that I am the ultimate arbiter of truth? I should start a sight called "Notsosureopedia." And be frank about what is fact, and what is speculation...and that they shouldn't take my word for it.
My wikipedia adventure went like this: i used it for basic facts at first. No big deal stuff . One day I went to Dr. Peter Duesbergs page and someone had written that he was an AIDS denier. Well, thats not true, so i did some light , factual editing. I went back the next day and it was switched back to being wrong. So, I re edited it to the correct information, next day same thing, it was switched back. They gave me a warning, I corrected the BULLSHIT anew...
And then they blocked me from editing.
I use it now as a status indicator for what normies are supposed to think.
Thanks for this, known by many of us for years, increasingly co-opted by the Powers That Shouldn't Be.
Tereza below has it right, and rightly so.
Perhaps it is time for those of us who value objective truth (it is approachable!) should get together and start up an "Objectivitypedia" striving for transparency on all issues.
“All the problems of the man who fears for his humanity come down to the same question: how to remain free?” Stefan Zweig
While true, they have not infiltrated everything. Basic scientific concepts (biological/physics etc.) seem to be well explained. Within the paradigm no doubt, but nearly everything is inside that.
I'm hearing the opposite when it comes to Wikipedia--science topics have become heavily politicized is what I'm hearing. Woke has indeed spread into science and medicine in some instances.
Wikipedia needs to be investigated by Congress. I suggest that Marjorie Taylor Green take up the hearings. These rad bastards are completely in sync to destroy America along with the Democratic Party of evil sadistic pedophiles.
Every Democrat and rhino needs to be investigated by the people. The CIA FBI and DOJ are democrat operatives who incidentally are in charge of Wikipedia.
Good luck getting Congress to do that. And if they did, I understand where Jack is coming from: we are sick of "hearings" that don't lead to justice where people receive consequences for their actions.
They are aligned with the Democratic Party, which is the party of repression and propaganda. The fathers of slavery and the Ku Klux Klan have been exposed as evil brainwashing monsters, praying on the normal people, financially spiritually, and repressively. Wikipedia is lies.
For the thousands of critical thinkers that read these "alternative" sites , seeking honest interpretations for what is going on ..... this reporting of "bias and disinformation" presented on Wikipedia ( and of course all the other deep state owned media ) , is not a revelation.
When the minority , these critical thinkers ,send anything like this to the hundreds of thousands , or millions, of our friends or family ........ our emails usually go into trash faster than one can say " I don'twannahearit "
Trevor from GCHQ says this article isn't just or fair... He says, "To the victor the narrative"... Victor from Basingstoke isn't sure and doesn't know what Nazareth is. He says "talk to Spike from Carolina", Spike says 'no comment'...
You should see the 'Cassells Book of Knowledge' seven set volume I have from the 1890s... Fuzzy wuzzies, whirling dervishes, colonial benefits and everything... Which is why books get burned, not because there is inherent colonial racism, but the history of simple 'truths'. Digital can kiss my arschloss, vapid and transient, here today, gone tomorrow, which is why the 'ubermensch' (imbeciles) love it.
The Church of Scientology is an interesting censor. I don't know if Sanger is a psyop within a psyop. Just a nanosecond ago, the CIA and FBI were the opposite of far left and liberal. Without question, Wikipedia is a propaganda tool. But I wonder if it's now pushing people in another direction. The concept of Wikipedia is brilliant, and they definitely got the whole world to do the work for them. It still gives good information on non-controversial topics and even between the lines on the censored ones. Thanks for this article, Matthieu!
I agree that some of the historical entries to Wikipedia are helpful. But of course, the deep state is going use that website to their advantage. It probably gets more traffic than most television networks.
I'm not surprised that the Scientology hierarchy would manipulate Wikipedia pages to censor and cover up their wicked deeds. They are ruthless in their PR.
During the Obama years a law was passed that dismantled the block on U.S. intelligence agencies, allowing them to legally do psyops and propagandize the American public. The timeline that Sanger lays out does make sense to me based on other things that were happening from '06 to 2018.
"During the Obama years a law was passed that dismantled the block on U.S. intelligence agencies, allowing them to legally do psyops and propagandize the American public."
For those unclear, that would be "the Smith-Mundt Modernization Act of 2012"
The original " unimproved" act had declared such activities illegal.
Yes! I appreciate you filling in that detail, BT. I didn't have time last Tuesday to look that up. 2012 does appear to synch with the timeline when the propaganda inside U.S. borders exploded.
Matthieu -
While I don't know the specific contents of the revised act, my understanding is that it was a 180 degree reversal: protective act becomes predatory/permissive act.
Citizens aware of the change might feel compelled to re-examine:
1) Sandy Hook( Dec2012 event, possibly quite close to bill passage, unsure)
2) FLA Stoneman highschool shooting
3) Uvalde school shooting
4) George Floyd psyop in Minneapolis
5) JAN6th " Insurrection"
6) Covid Psyop- BioWeapon/Injections- TurboCancer/Genocide
Great chunks of these events could LEGALLY be totally false, and the product of government planning and crisis actors.
All "Commitee Investigations" before the US Congress post-2012 ....Jan6th, Twitter/Social Media Hearings/ Ron Johnson's CV19 Hearings ...
are, imo, ALL suspect, as
*potentially, _LEGAL _psyops*.
None of which is pleasant to digest in a Republic, or a "Representative Democracy".
In hindsight, it was, and is,
a PROFOUNDLY UnConstitutional Act
...that made it LEGAL TO LIE TO, and DECEIVE We The People.
And it hasn't stopped.
Yes, Scientology's inclusion confirms the role Mathew Crawford has been saying they have, as a central source of chaos agents and controlled narrative.
I'm just wondering if this follows the Malone playbook. Wait until something's obvious to everyone who's paying attention, then get an 'insider' to blow the whistle and point to the solution--Conservapedia! Keeping everything inside the game lines of left vs. right.
I used to love Wikipedia and donated to them, even did a little editing/ contributions. Now it's clear that Jimmy Wales, WEFfie YGL, right?, had this planned from the start. What are the odds his co-founder wasn't in on it?
Unless I am looking for something trivial and fun, I scroll right past the wikipedia answer.
Someone in response to me saying that said "Well, why don't you go in and correct the mistakes made by others."
My reply was "that's exactly my point,"
The idea of open source information is great...until you realize that agendas are out there.
And who am I to declare that I am the ultimate arbiter of truth? I should start a sight called "Notsosureopedia." And be frank about what is fact, and what is speculation...and that they shouldn't take my word for it.
There's no point in altering it. Even ten or twelve years ago I heard about armies that would scrub anything verboten from wiki.
It is even more useless than it used to be.
My wikipedia adventure went like this: i used it for basic facts at first. No big deal stuff . One day I went to Dr. Peter Duesbergs page and someone had written that he was an AIDS denier. Well, thats not true, so i did some light , factual editing. I went back the next day and it was switched back to being wrong. So, I re edited it to the correct information, next day same thing, it was switched back. They gave me a warning, I corrected the BULLSHIT anew...
And then they blocked me from editing.
I use it now as a status indicator for what normies are supposed to think.
That's so Orwellian. I'm sure the A.I. bots make it easier to edit like that. No need for humans. The bots will do it much faster.
Sure, but somebody told the bota what to do.
Orwellian is exactly correct.
Now fascipedia. What a rotten joke. No joy from these propagandists.
Thanks for this, known by many of us for years, increasingly co-opted by the Powers That Shouldn't Be.
Tereza below has it right, and rightly so.
Perhaps it is time for those of us who value objective truth (it is approachable!) should get together and start up an "Objectivitypedia" striving for transparency on all issues.
“All the problems of the man who fears for his humanity come down to the same question: how to remain free?” Stefan Zweig
I like, "Objectivitypedia" but that will take hundreds of dedicated volunteer editors to keep out the idealogues and disinformation spreaders.
While true, they have not infiltrated everything. Basic scientific concepts (biological/physics etc.) seem to be well explained. Within the paradigm no doubt, but nearly everything is inside that.
I'm hearing the opposite when it comes to Wikipedia--science topics have become heavily politicized is what I'm hearing. Woke has indeed spread into science and medicine in some instances.
Wikipedia needs to be investigated by Congress. I suggest that Marjorie Taylor Green take up the hearings. These rad bastards are completely in sync to destroy America along with the Democratic Party of evil sadistic pedophiles.
Congress needs to be investigated by Wikipedia.
Both of them need to be abandoned.
Try Responsible Freedom instead?
Every Democrat and rhino needs to be investigated by the people. The CIA FBI and DOJ are democrat operatives who incidentally are in charge of Wikipedia.
Good luck getting Congress to do that. And if they did, I understand where Jack is coming from: we are sick of "hearings" that don't lead to justice where people receive consequences for their actions.
They are aligned with the Democratic Party, which is the party of repression and propaganda. The fathers of slavery and the Ku Klux Klan have been exposed as evil brainwashing monsters, praying on the normal people, financially spiritually, and repressively. Wikipedia is lies.
For the thousands of critical thinkers that read these "alternative" sites , seeking honest interpretations for what is going on ..... this reporting of "bias and disinformation" presented on Wikipedia ( and of course all the other deep state owned media ) , is not a revelation.
When the minority , these critical thinkers ,send anything like this to the hundreds of thousands , or millions, of our friends or family ........ our emails usually go into trash faster than one can say " I don'twannahearit "
Trevor from GCHQ says this article isn't just or fair... He says, "To the victor the narrative"... Victor from Basingstoke isn't sure and doesn't know what Nazareth is. He says "talk to Spike from Carolina", Spike says 'no comment'...
I thought Jimmy Wales was the wiki founder.
He is a co-founder along with Sanger.
Errr, ummmm....
" Encyclopedia Britannica".
'nuff said?
New lamps for old?
Technology changes, but not the game.
Appetite for Domination.
You should see the 'Cassells Book of Knowledge' seven set volume I have from the 1890s... Fuzzy wuzzies, whirling dervishes, colonial benefits and everything... Which is why books get burned, not because there is inherent colonial racism, but the history of simple 'truths'. Digital can kiss my arschloss, vapid and transient, here today, gone tomorrow, which is why the 'ubermensch' (imbeciles) love it.
I like how you put that. LOL. Well said.