Schools should never be teaching students anything about SEX. Not Ever. That's not appropriate at all. And who decides if such SEX teaching is "age-appropriate"? It should have never been a part of school, even at the beginning of it, when it was less shocking. It's the usual "Camel's Nose" ploy. Worm your way into it. Get people used to it. First, little-by-little, then a whole, whole lot.
Go back to the 60s. It was going on then but an example would be: Phys. Ed. class. Girls in one classroom with Gym teacher. Teacher pulls window shades down. Then informs girls about menstruation. That was it. What the boys did? Who knows?
My answer to your question is the same one I give when asked why people still spend time on Facebook--because everyone is there. X not so much as Facebook but still enough to get people coming back. One reason I use X is for sports related news and content. But its also fun to post on controversial topics now on X and not get banned like you did before Musk took over.
My recent experiment on the Tube got a week's suspension and one strike for the title Hollywood & PedoSadist Cults. Now I had already posted Anneke Lucas and PedoSadist Cults and that didn't do it. But the addition of Hollywood did. I also mentioned Out of Shadows in the description, which they had just removed after its release in April of 2020 and 13M views. Why now? Does it have anything to do with the attack on Russell Brand? Here it is linked to Rumble: https://thirdparadigm.substack.com/p/hollywood-and-pedosadist-cults.
The recent increase in social media censorship is most likely tied to the upcoming charade we still call an "election." Can you believe the POTUS election is only about a year away?
The Tube opened up and allowed election fraud conversation this past year but they will probably also go back to censoring that topic as well.
Hollywood is an integral part of the system, as you know. Not surprised they are protecting that industry. YouTube relies heavily on Hollywood for content.
I don't know, Matthieu, I feel that it relates to something more global and immediate. I think there is more shitfuckery (to use Jonathon Reese's technical term) planned for this fall and it involves those sick circles of Satanic rituals. I'm just reading more now about Pizzagate that should be called Pedogate: https://www.unz.com/article/pizzagate/ and Pizzagate & the Podestas by Reality Calls on Bitchute: https://www.bitchute.com/video/JkQg8LbNu10G/. Of course, these things are tied to politicians so you may be right. Fascinating stuff.
I've had a channel there since my first YT ban on How to Lie With Statistics in 2011, pre-Substack. Hands down, Substack is the best format for comment threads that encourage conversation, lack of censorship, and creation of community through attracting like-minded people with cross-pollination. Although I started SS 6 mos later, my readers here have grown 2-3X as fast as YT.
YT, however, allows for organizing material by playlists, which neither Rumble nor SS does. My pages on these feel cluttered where I can't point someone to a coherent narrative on a topic. And YT has people who've been watching a long time and get more complex points that I've been building over several episodes.
There's also a 'posse effect' that I get from YT and SS. It's harder for a random rude commenter to fling insults, where my Rumble has few or no comments other than occasional hecklers. But this is also a factor of the time I've put into cultivating relationships with other channels on Rumble, which is nil.
I'm looking to move my thirdparadigm.org website and other domains to a new hosting service and Gabriel has kindly offered to help me set up a new site to try to get the best of three worlds. I'm glad to have Rumble as an option and I'd embed them as the video if Substack let me. Pros and cons.
You can easily see how Substack is the freest of speech platforms and does offer robust comment threads. But why don't they allow Rumble embedding of videos? That bothers me a bit.
Oh sorry, I'm skipping decades! My video was on the 'unvaxxed are dying in droves con' in 2021 not 2011. And yes, Substack is certainly the freest platform and the best for community and conversation. But how do they get away with this being based in SF where Newsom has imposed stiff penalties for platforms spreading 'disinformation'? Gabriel of Libre Solutions did a recent post asking if it was a trap: https://libresolutionsnetwork.substack.com/p/is-this-platform-a-trap.
I also have questions about Peter Thiel, Rumble's overlord, and his history with Palantir that intentionally left a back door for spying on the US for Israel, if memory serves. His money all came from the DoD, until recently. So how likely is it that that isn't a trap? I continue to use what's available and not live in fear but I'm not sure any of these are existing out of principle.
Schools should never be teaching students anything about SEX. Not Ever. That's not appropriate at all. And who decides if such SEX teaching is "age-appropriate"? It should have never been a part of school, even at the beginning of it, when it was less shocking. It's the usual "Camel's Nose" ploy. Worm your way into it. Get people used to it. First, little-by-little, then a whole, whole lot.
Yeah, think about where the sex education was in the 80s and 90s vs. now. Like you said--the camel got his nose under the tent.
the frog slowly boiled into a disgusting stew.
Go back to the 60s. It was going on then but an example would be: Phys. Ed. class. Girls in one classroom with Gym teacher. Teacher pulls window shades down. Then informs girls about menstruation. That was it. What the boys did? Who knows?
Why are people stil using twitter/ X?
Just say no 😘
My answer to your question is the same one I give when asked why people still spend time on Facebook--because everyone is there. X not so much as Facebook but still enough to get people coming back. One reason I use X is for sports related news and content. But its also fun to post on controversial topics now on X and not get banned like you did before Musk took over.
If you put a lefty in charge you are not for free speech except for leftists.
I can't disagree with you. The term "Leftists" doesn't include classical liberals anymore, so...you're correct.
My recent experiment on the Tube got a week's suspension and one strike for the title Hollywood & PedoSadist Cults. Now I had already posted Anneke Lucas and PedoSadist Cults and that didn't do it. But the addition of Hollywood did. I also mentioned Out of Shadows in the description, which they had just removed after its release in April of 2020 and 13M views. Why now? Does it have anything to do with the attack on Russell Brand? Here it is linked to Rumble: https://thirdparadigm.substack.com/p/hollywood-and-pedosadist-cults.
The recent increase in social media censorship is most likely tied to the upcoming charade we still call an "election." Can you believe the POTUS election is only about a year away?
The Tube opened up and allowed election fraud conversation this past year but they will probably also go back to censoring that topic as well.
Hollywood is an integral part of the system, as you know. Not surprised they are protecting that industry. YouTube relies heavily on Hollywood for content.
I don't know, Matthieu, I feel that it relates to something more global and immediate. I think there is more shitfuckery (to use Jonathon Reese's technical term) planned for this fall and it involves those sick circles of Satanic rituals. I'm just reading more now about Pizzagate that should be called Pedogate: https://www.unz.com/article/pizzagate/ and Pizzagate & the Podestas by Reality Calls on Bitchute: https://www.bitchute.com/video/JkQg8LbNu10G/. Of course, these things are tied to politicians so you may be right. Fascinating stuff.
Tereza, how are you liking Rumble?
I've had a channel there since my first YT ban on How to Lie With Statistics in 2011, pre-Substack. Hands down, Substack is the best format for comment threads that encourage conversation, lack of censorship, and creation of community through attracting like-minded people with cross-pollination. Although I started SS 6 mos later, my readers here have grown 2-3X as fast as YT.
YT, however, allows for organizing material by playlists, which neither Rumble nor SS does. My pages on these feel cluttered where I can't point someone to a coherent narrative on a topic. And YT has people who've been watching a long time and get more complex points that I've been building over several episodes.
There's also a 'posse effect' that I get from YT and SS. It's harder for a random rude commenter to fling insults, where my Rumble has few or no comments other than occasional hecklers. But this is also a factor of the time I've put into cultivating relationships with other channels on Rumble, which is nil.
I'm looking to move my thirdparadigm.org website and other domains to a new hosting service and Gabriel has kindly offered to help me set up a new site to try to get the best of three worlds. I'm glad to have Rumble as an option and I'd embed them as the video if Substack let me. Pros and cons.
You can easily see how Substack is the freest of speech platforms and does offer robust comment threads. But why don't they allow Rumble embedding of videos? That bothers me a bit.
Did you say Substack was around in 2012?
Oh sorry, I'm skipping decades! My video was on the 'unvaxxed are dying in droves con' in 2021 not 2011. And yes, Substack is certainly the freest platform and the best for community and conversation. But how do they get away with this being based in SF where Newsom has imposed stiff penalties for platforms spreading 'disinformation'? Gabriel of Libre Solutions did a recent post asking if it was a trap: https://libresolutionsnetwork.substack.com/p/is-this-platform-a-trap.
I also have questions about Peter Thiel, Rumble's overlord, and his history with Palantir that intentionally left a back door for spying on the US for Israel, if memory serves. His money all came from the DoD, until recently. So how likely is it that that isn't a trap? I continue to use what's available and not live in fear but I'm not sure any of these are existing out of principle.