X.com Censorship Exposed
Here are the ten keywords that will get your account demonetized. Is Elon Musk a true free speech warrior?
The German government calls Libs of TikTok “absolutley f****** garbage.”
Which means LOTT is doing good work.
For example—today, the creator of Libs of TikTok exposed X.com (formerly Twitter) to be just another platform practicing censorship while denying they do.
Chaya Raichik recently posted on X her results of a “study” she performed to nail down which keywords trigger the X.com algorithm to demonetize an account.
She shared these results yesterday:
Raichik had to self-censor some of the letters so she could share the list on X.
Here are the top ten words in their entirety:
Drag Queen
Porn
Groomer
Innocence/Innocent
Trans
LGBTQ
Police
Non-binary
Ugly
Amen
Are you shocked?
Maybe if you still believed in Elon Musk’s commitment to free speech.
I stopped hoping that Musk was different when he hired this WEF plant to be the X.com CEO:
From Human Events:
Let's break it down. Drag queen is likely offensive because many of those who post about drag queens post about what's called Drag Queen Story Hour, an event founded in San Francisco and designed to "queer" early childhood education. When the phenomenon became known in conservative circles, liberals basically said it wasn't happening, then they admitted it was happening, then they decided it's a good thing for men to parade around in women's underclothes and dance provocatively for children. The common consensus in progressive circles was that anyone who disagreed is hateful.
Porn is readily available on X. Porn stars have accounts on the site where extremely explicit acts are shown. But apparently, you can't even say the word, even without any visuals.
James Lindsay likely gets credit for the tumult surrounding the word groomer. After Ron DeSantis passed the Parental Rights in Education Act in Florida, which ensures gender ideology is eradicated from the curriculum, the Biden administration and their Democrat acolytes began to call it the "don't say gay bill," because they falsely claimed that it prevented teachers from saying "gay" in schools. It simply prevented teachers from grooming students with gender ideology and non-age appropriate sex lessons. Lindsay pointed this out, repeatedly and started the “ok groomer” trend. Now you can't say groomer on X and get ad rev.
Innocent? This one is perplexing. Do they simply not want those of us who are engaged in child-safeguarding to not point out that children are innocent? And trans or non-binary, with the amount of recognition that the trans community and activists are looking for, it's surprising that their allies at Twitter would demonetize content that appears alongside that word. What happened to "recognition matters"?
Police is nonsensical, ugly is just confusing. Are people that sensitive? Are other insults also demonetized? We will find out. By far the most shocking is the prohibition on the word Amen.
Amen is a word of prayer. It's a word that brings with it reverence of a higher power. But our culture is so obsessed with the self that we collectively cannot even fathom the concept of there being anyone or any entity that is larger, greater, and more powerful than human beings. Amen is an affront to the self-obsessed religion of the west, and while the algorithms that demonetize posts of prayer may not be "aware" of it, the machine learning that is feeding them would guide those algorithms to those conclusions.
I wouldn’t say censoring the word “Police” is “nonsensical.” That could reflect attempts to suppress information critical of law enforcement. Or something.
Elon appears to be walking a tightrope to please conservatives with public displays of sympathy while keeping WEF infiltrator Yaccarino in charge of the day-to-day operations. She is pretty up front with her views on the need for censorship to keep advertisers happy.
Elon is still making public moves like this…but who is still believing his act?
Notice how Musk says the list of banned words needs to be “trimmed”, not completely erased.
Do you believe X.com truly supports free speech?
Schools should never be teaching students anything about SEX. Not Ever. That's not appropriate at all. And who decides if such SEX teaching is "age-appropriate"? It should have never been a part of school, even at the beginning of it, when it was less shocking. It's the usual "Camel's Nose" ploy. Worm your way into it. Get people used to it. First, little-by-little, then a whole, whole lot.
Why are people stil using twitter/ X?
Just say no 😘